
March 22, 2026 | vol 18
MONAD ORIGIN
words Onur Baştürk
photos Jean Van Cleemput
A vibration you cannot see, a frequency you cannot hold — in the hands of Monad Origin, both find structure. Working between installation, object and spatial research, the Belgium-based duo approaches sound not as atmosphere but as a generative force. Their works arise not from sketches or typologies, but from signals, waves and resonance.
Founded by Nick Peeters and Anujin Byambaa, Monad Origin operates as a non-disciplinary labo/atelier where sound, light and material intersect. The works they presented at Collectible in Brussels this year translated raw frequencies into sculptural and functional forms, signalling a practice that has evolved beyond experimentation into a language of its own.

SOUND BEHAVES LIKE A CONSTRUCTION FORCE
You describe Monad Origin as a non-disciplinary labo/atelier. Where does this approach diverge from conventional practices?
Monad Origin does not start from function, form or medium, but from a generative installation that uses sound as input. The atelier operates as a laboratory, and the outcomes remain undefined until the process stabilises. Whether the result becomes an object, a structure or a spatial element is determined only at the end of the process — not at the beginning. Our labo researches how immaterial inputs — specifically sound — can generate stable physical artefacts without forcing them into existing typologies.
When did you begin treating sound as a material rather than a reference?
We both have an emotional, physical and symbolic connection to sound. The transition occurred when we stopped asking what sound means and began asking what sound does. When treated as a measurable phenomenon rather than an expressive layer, sound behaves like a construction force. It becomes comparable to gravity or magnetic tension — something that can organise space without physical representation. This shift allowed sound to move from reference to infrastructure in our practice.
WE DO NOT ELIMINATE CHAOS; WE WORK WITHIN IT
How do you identify what you call ‘meaningful vibrations’?
We do not eliminate chaos; we work within it. The system we’ve developed does not seek harmony or musicality. Instead, it identifies zones of stability within vibration — frequencies that produce coherent spatial behaviour when translated. Meaningful vibrations are those that generate coherence: repeatable proportions, internal balance and structural legibility. Many frequencies collapse immediately. Others insist on existing. Those moments of insistence guide the work.
How are vibrations translated into physical form?
A sound is first processed through our installation, where it is converted into spatial data using light. Relationships between mass, void, thickness and tension emerge. We capture these forms photographically or with UV-reactive ink. From this field of possibilities, selection becomes architectural rather than aesthetic. We determine which forms demonstrate sufficient equilibrium to exist materially. Only then are scale, material and fabrication parameters introduced. All Monad Origin artefacts are hand-finished in our atelier in Belgium.

FUNCTION IS NEVER IMPOSED
When do you understand whether a piece will be functional?
Function is never imposed. It appears, or it doesn’t. When a form naturally stabilises into horizontality, containment or load-bearing logic, it may become usable. If not, it remains a sculptural artefact. We do not believe functionality should justify a form. When it appears without force, it strengthens the object’s presence.
How does working as a single entity shape your output?
Every artefact must survive two different sensitivities, two ways of reading the same signal. Operating as a single entity removes authorship as a driving force. This results in works that become less expressive and more precise — vessels that feel inevitable rather than designed.
How has your natural division of roles formed?
The division emerged through practice, not strategy. As the system behind Monad Origin became more complex, it was no longer possible for the same position to both generate and validate form. The work demanded separation.
Anujin’s digital, conceptual and cultural perspective operates outside the internal loop. As head of artefacts, she does not intervene in generation itself. Her role is to decide whether a form should exist at all, and she then handles visualisation, material use and planning.
Nick’s background in making, construction and sound technology places him at the operational core. As head of ritual, he constructs and maintains the generative system, defining how sound produces spatial data. His role is internal to the system, concerned with continuity and transformation rather than outcome.
NOT EXPERIMENTS, BUT CONFIRMATIONS
What stage did your Collectible presentation represent?
The presentation represented a point of maturity. The works were not experiments, but confirmations — proof that the system can operate across scales and media, from graphics to sculptural and functional objects, and even architectural elements like walls. Monad Origin is no longer proposing an idea; it is presenting a language.

NOT EXPERIMENTS, BUT CONFIRMATIONS
What stage did your Collectible presentation represent?
The presentation represented a point of maturity. The works were not experiments, but confirmations — proof that the system can operate across scales and media, from graphics to sculptural and functional objects, and even architectural elements like walls. Monad Origin is no longer proposing an idea; it is presenting a language.
- The full story is featured in Vol.18 -














